We know that our digital data is being collected all the time. What is being done to protect us?
Gay-dating-app Grindr is entering into a public merger. Chinese company Kunlun Tech, the original owners, divested Grindr two years ago over US national security concerns.
Tiktok, owned by ByteDance, has taken steps to publicly distance itself from China also over fears that user data could be passed along to the Chinese Communist Party.
Grindr was previously singled out for selling users’ location data, which in some cases made it possible to infer personal information. It has since introduced better privacy policies.
The data has since been used to demonstrate the intelligence risks associated with commercially available information to US government agencies. Individuals should perhaps take heed too.
Location services as well as health data (accumulated on period-tracking apps, for instance) shared for targeted advertising could be used as evidence in US states where abortion is criminalized.
Having a digital footprint is almost inevitable; the problem lies in accepting this simply as a “necessary evil”. The solution, however, cannot be to make data totally unavailable to the public.
Researchers and journalists play an essential role in monitoring Big Tech. The Digital Services Act recently passed by the EU makes holding these companies accountable a possibility.