Encrypted messaging app Telegram is becoming a headache for governments across the world for not taking action against extremist content.
Telegram, the end-to-end encrypted messaging service, was founded in 2013 by Russian duo Pavel and Nikolai Durov. Pavel also founded VKontakte, Russia’s take on Facebook.
With 550 million monthly active users, Telegram ranks as the 5th most popular global messaging service. Apart from Chinese apps WeChat and QQ, it’s second only to WhatsApp and Messenger.
One of its USPs is end-to-end encryption which benefits people living under distatorships. But on the flip-side it’s also a platform favoured by the criminally minded to spread hate.
In the US and Germany, for instance, Telegram has become the medium of choice for groups such as QAnon, Querdenkers among others to spew anti-Semitic hate and conspiracy theories.
Lot of German Telegram groups are being used to put out a “hit-list” of politicians who enforce Covid rules. Many of these groups have tens of thousands of active followers.
Telegram’s refusal to co-operate with authorities and take down extremist content has been a matter of annoyance for many governments.
It used to be a messaging platform of choice for Islamic State militants till Telegram decided to co-operate with Europol to block that content. But this was a rare instance.
In places where free speech is stifled, Telegram has been a blessing. One of the best examples is how Telegram outmanoeuvred Russian state telco and eventually made the Kremlin blink.
In Belarus and Iran, where free press is a luxury, Telegram channels have been parallel media outlets to inform the public about real unfiltered news.
There have been calls for banning the use of Telegram if it does not co-operate with government authorities to take down extremist content. But banning it would be a slippery slope.
Ann Cathrin Riedel, from the Association of Liberal Internet Policy notes, "Radical thoughts do not disappear when you block a messenger service, people just move on to another platform."
In this reading, we find out what’s causing government backlash against Telegram, why its founder is so reclusive and how powerful a tool it can be, against authoritarian regimes.